Extragonadal Germ Cell Tumors Treatment (PDQ®)–Health Professional Version

General Information About Extragonadal Germ Cell Tumors

Incidence and Mortality

Extragonadal germ cell tumors are rare and account for only a small percentage of all germ cell tumors. However, the true incidence of these tumors may conceivably be higher than originally thought because of failure to diagnose them properly.

Cellular Classification of Extragonadal Germ Cell Tumors

Extragonadal germ cell tumors can be benign (teratoma) or malignant. The latter group can be divided into seminoma and nonseminoma germ cell tumors, which include:

  • Embryonal carcinomas.
  • Malignant teratomas.
  • Endodermal sinus tumors.
  • Choriocarcinomas.
  • Mixed germ cell tumors.

Extragonadal germ cell tumors occur much more often in males than in females [1] and are usually seen in young adults. These aggressive neoplasms can arise virtually anywhere, but the site of origin is typically in the midline (mediastinum, retroperitoneum, or pineal gland). Gonadal origin should be excluded by careful testicular examination and ultrasound. The diagnosis can be difficult and should be considered in any patient with a poorly defined epithelial malignancy, particularly young individuals with midline masses.[2,3]

An international germ cell tumor prognostic classification has been developed based on a retrospective analysis of 5,202 patients with metastatic nonseminomatous germ cell tumors and 660 patients with metastatic seminomatous germ cell tumors.[4] All patients received treatment with cisplatin-containing or carboplatin-containing therapy as their first chemotherapy course. The prognostic classification, shown below, was agreed on in early 1997 by all major clinical trial groups worldwide and should be used for the reporting of clinical trial results of patients with extragonadal germ cell tumors.

Good Prognosis

Nonseminoma

  • Testis/retroperitoneal primary

    and

  • No nonpulmonary visceral metastases

    and

  • Good markers–all of:
    • Alpha-fetoprotein (AFP) less than 1,000 ng/mL

      and

    • Beta-human chorionic gonadotropin (beta-hCG) less than 5,000 IU/L (1,000 ng/mL)

      and

    • Lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) less than 1.5 × upper limit of normal
  • A total of 56% of nonseminomas are good prognosis. The 5-year progression-free survival (PFS) rate is 89%; the 5-year survival rate is 92%.

Seminoma

  • Any primary site

    and

  • No nonpulmonary visceral metastases

    and

  • Normal AFP, any beta-hCG, any LDH
  • A total of 90% of seminomas are good prognosis. The 5-year PFS rate is 82%; the 5-year survival rate is 86%.

Intermediate Prognosis

Nonseminoma

  • Testis/retroperitoneal primary

    and

  • No nonpulmonary visceral metastases

    and

  • Intermediate markers–any of:
    • AFP 1,000 ng/mL or greater and 10,000 ng/mL or less

      or

    • Beta-hCG 5,000 IU/L or greater and 50,000 IU/L or less

      or

    • LDH 1.5 × upper limit of normal or greater and 10 × upper limit of normal or less
  • A total of 28% of nonseminomas are intermediate prognosis. The 5-year PFS rate is 75%; the 5-year survival rate is 80%.

Seminoma

  • Any primary site

    and

  • Nonpulmonary visceral metastases

    and

  • Normal AFP, any beta-hCG, any LDH
  • A total of 10% of seminomas are intermediate prognosis. The 5-year PFS rate is 67%; the 5-year survival rate is 72%.

Poor Prognosis

Nonseminoma

  • Mediastinal primary

    or

  • Nonpulmonary visceral metastases

    or

  • Poor markers–any of:
    • AFP greater than 10,000 ng/mL

      or

    • Beta-hCG greater than 50,000 IU/L (1,000 ng/mL)

      or

    • LDH greater than 10 × upper limit of normal
  • A total of 16% of nonseminomas are poor prognosis. The 5-year PFS rate is 41%; the 5-year survival rate is 48%.

Seminoma

No patients are classified as poor prognosis.

References
  1. Mayordomo JI, Paz-Ares L, Rivera F, et al.: Ovarian and extragonadal malignant germ-cell tumors in females: a single-institution experience with 43 patients. Ann Oncol 5 (3): 225-31, 1994. [PUBMED Abstract]
  2. Greco FA, Vaughn WK, Hainsworth JD: Advanced poorly differentiated carcinoma of unknown primary site: recognition of a treatable syndrome. Ann Intern Med 104 (4): 547-53, 1986. [PUBMED Abstract]
  3. Hainsworth JD, Greco FA: Extragonadal germ cell tumors and unrecognized germ cell tumors. Semin Oncol 19 (2): 119-27, 1992. [PUBMED Abstract]
  4. International Germ Cell Consensus Classification: a prognostic factor-based staging system for metastatic germ cell cancers. International Germ Cell Cancer Collaborative Group. J Clin Oncol 15 (2): 594-603, 1997. [PUBMED Abstract]

Treatment of Benign Teratoma

Benign teratomas are treated with surgical excision only. These tumors are frequently very large, and the surgical procedure can be formidable.

Current Clinical Trials

Use our advanced clinical trial search to find NCI-supported cancer clinical trials that are now enrolling patients. The search can be narrowed by location of the trial, type of treatment, name of the drug, and other criteria. General information about clinical trials is also available.

Treatment of Seminoma

The diagnosis of seminoma requires that the serum alpha-fetoprotein be normal, with no other germ cells present. Management decisions in patients presenting with these tumors can be difficult.

As in testicular seminoma, these tumors are very radiosensitive. About 60% to 80% of patients will remain disease free after treatment with radiation therapy.[1] Craniospinal radiation therapy for intracranial germinomas (the intracranial counterpart of seminoma) is associated with relapse-free and overall survival rates of 90% to 95% at 5 years, respectively, as evidenced in the GER-GPO-MAKEI-86/89 trial, for example.[2][Level of evidence C1]

Initial chemotherapy with regimens used in nonseminoma testicular cancer is also efficacious. Practically speaking, patients with localized relatively small tumors are usually treated initially with radiation therapy, while those with very bulky tumors or nonlocalized tumors are treated with etoposide-based and cisplatin-based chemotherapy regimens.

As in testicular seminoma, many patients will be left with a residual mass posttreatment. If the residual mass is smaller than 3.0 cm, most experts agree that observation is appropriate. In those with larger residual masses, some experts favor surgical excision while others favor observation.[3,4]

Current Clinical Trials

Use our advanced clinical trial search to find NCI-supported cancer clinical trials that are now enrolling patients. The search can be narrowed by location of the trial, type of treatment, name of the drug, and other criteria. General information about clinical trials is also available.

References
  1. Clamon GH: Management of primary mediastinal seminoma. Chest 83 (2): 263-7, 1983. [PUBMED Abstract]
  2. Bamberg M, Kortmann RD, Calaminus G, et al.: Radiation therapy for intracranial germinoma: results of the German cooperative prospective trials MAKEI 83/86/89. J Clin Oncol 17 (8): 2585-92, 1999. [PUBMED Abstract]
  3. Motzer R, Bosl G, Heelan R, et al.: Residual mass: an indication for further therapy in patients with advanced seminoma following systemic chemotherapy. J Clin Oncol 5 (7): 1064-70, 1987. [PUBMED Abstract]
  4. Schultz SM, Einhorn LH, Conces DJ, et al.: Management of postchemotherapy residual mass in patients with advanced seminoma: Indiana University experience. J Clin Oncol 7 (10): 1497-503, 1989. [PUBMED Abstract]

Treatment of Nonseminoma

Patients with nonseminomas should receive chemotherapy at diagnosis. These patients tend to have a large tumor volume at diagnosis and are usually symptomatic. Initial debulking surgery is rarely useful. Many high-risk patients qualify for clinical trials. Standard therapy is generally four courses of BEP (bleomycin, etoposide, and cisplatin).[1,2]

A randomized study comparing four courses of BEP with four courses of VIP (etoposide, ifosfamide, and cisplatin) showed similar overall survival (OS) and time-to-treatment failure for the two regimens in patients with advanced disseminated germ cell tumors who had not received previous chemotherapy.[3,4][Level of evidence A1] Of the 304 patients in this study, 66 had extragonadal primary tumors. In this subset of patients, responses to the two regimens were similar. Hematologic toxic effects in OS were substantially worse with the VIP regimen than with the BEP regimen.

Patients with a residual mass after chemotherapy may achieve long-term disease-free survival after postchemotherapy surgery with resection of all residual disease.[5][Level of evidence C2] Patients with nonseminomatous extragonadal germ cell tumors who relapse after front-line chemotherapy generally have poor prognoses with poor responses to salvage chemotherapy regimens, including autologous bone marrow transplant, that have had success for recurrent testicular cancer.[6-8] Such patients are candidates for studies of new approaches.

Mediastinal Nonseminoma

Mediastinal nonseminomas have certain unique aspects. The tumors are more frequent in individuals with Klinefelter syndrome and are associated with a risk of subsequent development of hematologic neoplasia that is not treatment related.[9,10] Approximately 50% of patients with mediastinal nonseminomas will survive with appropriate management.[11] High risk is partially related to tumor bulk, chemotherapy resistance, and a predisposition to develop hematologic neoplasia and other nongerm cell malignancies. In an uncontrolled study, some patients with a postchemotherapy residual mediastinal mass achieved long-term disease-free survival after complete resection, even when serum tumor markers were elevated.[5][Level of evidence C2] Patient selection factors may play a role in these favorable outcomes.

Retroperitoneal Nonseminoma

The prognosis of retroperitoneal nonseminoma is reasonably good and, similar to the situation with nodal metastasis from a testicular primary tumor, is related to tumor volume.

Current Clinical Trials

Use our advanced clinical trial search to find NCI-supported cancer clinical trials that are now enrolling patients. The search can be narrowed by location of the trial, type of treatment, name of the drug, and other criteria. General information about clinical trials is also available.

References
  1. Williams SD, Birch R, Einhorn LH, et al.: Treatment of disseminated germ-cell tumors with cisplatin, bleomycin, and either vinblastine or etoposide. N Engl J Med 316 (23): 1435-40, 1987. [PUBMED Abstract]
  2. Bosl GJ, Gluckman R, Geller NL, et al.: VAB-6: an effective chemotherapy regimen for patients with germ-cell tumors. J Clin Oncol 4 (10): 1493-9, 1986. [PUBMED Abstract]
  3. Nichols CR, Catalano PJ, Crawford ED, et al.: Randomized comparison of cisplatin and etoposide and either bleomycin or ifosfamide in treatment of advanced disseminated germ cell tumors: an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group, Southwest Oncology Group, and Cancer and Leukemia Group B Study. J Clin Oncol 16 (4): 1287-93, 1998. [PUBMED Abstract]
  4. Hinton S, Catalano PJ, Einhorn LH, et al.: Cisplatin, etoposide and either bleomycin or ifosfamide in the treatment of disseminated germ cell tumors: final analysis of an intergroup trial. Cancer 97 (8): 1869-75, 2003. [PUBMED Abstract]
  5. Schneider BP, Kesler KA, Brooks JA, et al.: Outcome of patients with residual germ cell or non-germ cell malignancy after resection of primary mediastinal nonseminomatous germ cell cancer. J Clin Oncol 22 (7): 1195-200, 2004. [PUBMED Abstract]
  6. Saxman SB, Nichols CR, Einhorn LH: Salvage chemotherapy in patients with extragonadal nonseminomatous germ cell tumors: the Indiana University experience. J Clin Oncol 12 (7): 1390-3, 1994. [PUBMED Abstract]
  7. Beyer J, Kramar A, Mandanas R, et al.: High-dose chemotherapy as salvage treatment in germ cell tumors: a multivariate analysis of prognostic variables. J Clin Oncol 14 (10): 2638-45, 1996. [PUBMED Abstract]
  8. Loehrer PJ, Gonin R, Nichols CR, et al.: Vinblastine plus ifosfamide plus cisplatin as initial salvage therapy in recurrent germ cell tumor. J Clin Oncol 16 (7): 2500-4, 1998. [PUBMED Abstract]
  9. Nichols CR, Heerema NA, Palmer C, et al.: Klinefelter's syndrome associated with mediastinal germ cell neoplasms. J Clin Oncol 5 (8): 1290-4, 1987. [PUBMED Abstract]
  10. Nichols CR, Roth BJ, Heerema N, et al.: Hematologic neoplasia associated with primary mediastinal germ-cell tumors. N Engl J Med 322 (20): 1425-9, 1990. [PUBMED Abstract]
  11. Nichols CR, Saxman S, Williams SD, et al.: Primary mediastinal nonseminomatous germ cell tumors. A modern single institution experience. Cancer 65 (7): 1641-6, 1990. [PUBMED Abstract]

Treatment of Recurrent or Refractory Extragonadal Germ Cell Tumors

A randomized controlled trial compared conventional doses of salvage chemotherapy to high-dose chemotherapy with autologous marrow rescue in 263 patients with recurrent or refractory germ cell tumors. Of the 263 patients, 43 of whom had extragonadal primary tumors, more toxic effects and treatment-related deaths were seen in the high-dose arm, without any improvement in response rate or overall survival.[1][Level of evidence A1]

Current Clinical Trials

Use our advanced clinical trial search to find NCI-supported cancer clinical trials that are now enrolling patients. The search can be narrowed by location of the trial, type of treatment, name of the drug, and other criteria. General information about clinical trials is also available.

References
  1. Pico JL, Rosti G, Kramar A, et al.: A randomised trial of high-dose chemotherapy in the salvage treatment of patients failing first-line platinum chemotherapy for advanced germ cell tumours. Ann Oncol 16 (7): 1152-9, 2005. [PUBMED Abstract]

Latest Updates to This Summary (12/09/2024)

The PDQ cancer information summaries are reviewed regularly and updated as new information becomes available. This section describes the latest changes made to this summary as of the date above.

Editorial changes were made to this summary.

This summary is written and maintained by the PDQ Adult Treatment Editorial Board, which is editorially independent of NCI. The summary reflects an independent review of the literature and does not represent a policy statement of NCI or NIH. More information about summary policies and the role of the PDQ Editorial Boards in maintaining the PDQ summaries can be found on the About This PDQ Summary and PDQ® Cancer Information for Health Professionals pages.

About This PDQ Summary

Purpose of This Summary

This PDQ cancer information summary for health professionals provides comprehensive, peer-reviewed, evidence-based information about the treatment of extragonadal germ cell tumors. It is intended as a resource to inform and assist clinicians in the care of their patients. It does not provide formal guidelines or recommendations for making health care decisions.

Reviewers and Updates

This summary is reviewed regularly and updated as necessary by the PDQ Adult Treatment Editorial Board, which is editorially independent of the National Cancer Institute (NCI). The summary reflects an independent review of the literature and does not represent a policy statement of NCI or the National Institutes of Health (NIH).

Board members review recently published articles each month to determine whether an article should:

  • be discussed at a meeting,
  • be cited with text, or
  • replace or update an existing article that is already cited.

Changes to the summaries are made through a consensus process in which Board members evaluate the strength of the evidence in the published articles and determine how the article should be included in the summary.

The lead reviewer for Extragonadal Germ Cell Tumors Treatment is:

  • Timothy Gilligan, MD (Cleveland Clinic Taussig Cancer Institute)

Any comments or questions about the summary content should be submitted to Cancer.gov through the NCI website's Email Us. Do not contact the individual Board Members with questions or comments about the summaries. Board members will not respond to individual inquiries.

Levels of Evidence

Some of the reference citations in this summary are accompanied by a level-of-evidence designation. These designations are intended to help readers assess the strength of the evidence supporting the use of specific interventions or approaches. The PDQ Adult Treatment Editorial Board uses a formal evidence ranking system in developing its level-of-evidence designations.

Permission to Use This Summary

PDQ is a registered trademark. Although the content of PDQ documents can be used freely as text, it cannot be identified as an NCI PDQ cancer information summary unless it is presented in its entirety and is regularly updated. However, an author would be permitted to write a sentence such as “NCI’s PDQ cancer information summary about breast cancer prevention states the risks succinctly: [include excerpt from the summary].”

The preferred citation for this PDQ summary is:

PDQ® Adult Treatment Editorial Board. PDQ Extragonadal Germ Cell Tumors Treatment. Bethesda, MD: National Cancer Institute. Updated <MM/DD/YYYY>. Available at: https://www.cancer.gov/types/extragonadal-germ-cell/hp/extragonadal-treatment-pdq. Accessed <MM/DD/YYYY>. [PMID: 26389346]

Images in this summary are used with permission of the author(s), artist, and/or publisher for use within the PDQ summaries only. Permission to use images outside the context of PDQ information must be obtained from the owner(s) and cannot be granted by the National Cancer Institute. Information about using the illustrations in this summary, along with many other cancer-related images, is available in Visuals Online, a collection of over 2,000 scientific images.

Disclaimer

Based on the strength of the available evidence, treatment options may be described as either “standard” or “under clinical evaluation.” These classifications should not be used as a basis for insurance reimbursement determinations. More information on insurance coverage is available on Cancer.gov on the Managing Cancer Care page.

Contact Us

More information about contacting us or receiving help with the Cancer.gov website can be found on our Contact Us for Help page. Questions can also be submitted to Cancer.gov through the website’s Email Us.