|
|
Phase III Randomized Comparison of 5-FU/CF vs 5-FU/LEV vs 5-FU/CF/LEV as Adjuvant Therapy Following Potentially Curative Resection of Dukes' B and C Carcinoma of the Colon
Alternate Title Fluorouracil and Leucovorin and/or Levamisole After Surgery In Treating Patients With Dukes' B Or Dukes' C Colon Cancer
Objectives I. Compare, in a Phase III setting, disease-free survival and overall survival of patients who have undergone potentially curative resection of Dukes' B or C carcinoma of the colon randomly assigned to adjuvant therapy with 5-fluorouracil/leucovorin vs. 5-fluorouracil/levamisole vs. 5-fluorouracil/leucovorin/levamisole. Entry Criteria Disease Characteristics: See General Eligibility Criteria Patient Characteristics: See General Eligibility Criteria General Eligibility Criteria: Patients under the age of 71 years at the time of potentially curative surgery for histologically documented Dukes' B or C carcinoma of the colon, provided no more than 42 days have intervened between surgery and initiation of adjuvant therapy. The full extent of tumor must be clearly defined by palpation without having to open the pelvic peritoneum to be classified as a primary tumor of the colon. Dukes' B disease is defined as tumor that has invaded the wall of the colon with extension to pericolic tissue but without involvement of lymph nodes, and Dukes' C disease is defined as invasion of the wall of the colon to any depth with extension to regional lymph nodes. Patients may have more than one synchronous primary colon tumor, in which case the stage of the more advanced tumor will be used for this protocol; presence of concurrent rectal cancer excludes. Patients with intestinal obstruction are eligible, and preliminary or complementary colostomy does not preclude entry. The presence of free perforation manifested by free air in the abdomen excludes, but patients with walled off perforations are eligible. If adjacent structures (e.g., bladder, small intestine, ovary) involved by direct extension of tumor were removed en bloc, the patient is eligible only if the surgical margins are histologically negative for tumor and it is the judgment of the surgeon that the resection was curative; the presence of noncontiguous intra-abdominal metastases, even if resected, renders a patient ineligible. Patients may have experienced postoperative complications as long as they are able to start therapy within 42 days. The CEA must be determined postoperatively (preoperative CEA is optional), but the results need not be known prior to randomization. There may have been no prior treatment for the current malignancy other than surgical resection. The postoperative WBC must be at least 4,000 and platelets at least 100,000, and adequate hepatic and renal function must be documented by the following parameters: total bilirubin not greater than 1.5 mg/dl, SGOT or SGPT not greater than 60 IU/ml, and serum creatinine not greater than 1.5 mg/dl. The performance status must be 0-2, and patients must be free from nonmalignant systemic disease (cardiovascular, renal, hepatic, etc.) that would preclude protocol chemotherapy. Aside from squamous and basal cell carcinoma of the skin and carcinoma in situ of the cervix, there may be no previous or concomitant second malignancy. Pregnancy excludes. Expected Enrollment 1,800 evaluable patients will be accrued over about 3 years; an additional 2 years will be required before final analysis. Outline Randomized study. Arm I: Single-agent Chemotherapy with Drug Modulation. 5-Fluorouracil, 5-FU, NSC-19893; with Leucovorin calcium, Citrovorum Factor, CF, NSC-3590. Arm II: Single-agent Chemotherapy with Drug Modulation plus Biological Response Modifier Therapy. 5-FU; with CF; plus Levamisole, LEV, NSC-177023. Arm III: Single-agent Chemotherapy plus Biological Response Modifier Therapy. 5-FU; plus LEV.Published Results Wolmark N, Rockette H, Mamounas E, et al.: Clinical trial to assess the relative efficacy of fluorouracil and leucovorin, fluorouracil and levamisole, and fluorouracil, leucovorin, and levamisole in patients with Dukes' B and C carcinoma of the colon: results from National Surgical Adjuvant Breast and Bowel Project C-04. J Clin Oncol 17 (11): 3553-9, 1999.[PUBMED Abstract] Wolmark N, Rockette H, Mamounas EP, et al.: The relative efficacy of 5-FU + leucovorin (FU-LV), 5-FU + levamisole (FU-LEV), and 5-FU + leucovorin + levamisole (FU-LV-LEV) in patients with Dukes' B and C carcinoma of the colon: first report of NSABP C-04. [Abstract] Proceedings of the American Society of Clinical Oncology 15: A460, 205a, 1996. Related PublicationsKim GP, Colangelo LH, Wieand HS, et al.: Prognostic and predictive roles of high-degree microsatellite instability in colon cancer: a National Cancer Institute-National Surgical Adjuvant Breast and Bowel Project Collaborative Study. J Clin Oncol 25 (7): 767-72, 2007.[PUBMED Abstract] Dignam JJ, Polite BN, Yothers G, et al.: Body mass index and outcomes in patients who receive adjuvant chemotherapy for colon cancer. J Natl Cancer Inst 98 (22): 1647-54, 2006.[PUBMED Abstract] Wang SJ, Zamboni BA, Wieand HS, et al.: Conditional survival for patients with colon cancer: an analysis of National Surgical Adjuvant Breast and Bowel Project (NSABP) trials C-03 through C-06. [Abstract] J Clin Oncol 24 (Suppl 18): A-6005, 302s, 2006. Kim GP, Colangelo L, Wieand H, et al.: Prognostic and predictive roles of high-degree microsatellite instability (MSI-H) in colon cancer: National Cancer Institute (NCI)-National Surgical Adjuvant Bowel Project (NSABP) collaborative study. [Abstract] American Society of Clinical Oncology 2005 Gastrointestinal Cancers Symposium, 27-29 January 2005, Miami, Florida. A-227, 2005. Allegra CJ, Paik S, Colangelo LH, et al.: Prognostic value of thymidylate synthase, Ki-67, and p53 in patients with Dukes' B and C colon cancer: a National Cancer Institute-National Surgical Adjuvant Breast and Bowel Project collaborative study. J Clin Oncol 21 (2): 241-50, 2003.[PUBMED Abstract] Wolmark N, Colangelo L, Wieand S: National Surgical Adjuvant Breast and Bowel Project trials in colon cancer. Semin Oncol 28 (1 Suppl 1): 9-13, 2001.[PUBMED Abstract] Dignam JJ, Colangelo L, Tian W, et al.: Outcomes among African-Americans and Caucasians in colon cancer adjuvant therapy trials: findings from the National Surgical Adjuvant Breast and Bowel Project. J Natl Cancer Inst 91 (22): 1933-40, 1999.[PUBMED Abstract] Mamounas E, Wieand S, Wolmark N, et al.: Comparative efficacy of adjuvant chemotherapy in patients with Dukes' B versus Dukes' C colon cancer: results from four National Surgical Adjuvant Breast and Bowel Project adjuvant studies (C-01, C-02, C-03, and C-04) J Clin Oncol 17 (5): 1349-55, 1999.[PUBMED Abstract] Trial Lead Organizations National Surgical Adjuvant Breast and Bowel Project
Clinical Research Program - Northern California Cancer Center
Note: The purpose of most clinical trials listed in this database is to test new cancer treatments, or new methods of diagnosing, screening, or preventing cancer. Because all potentially harmful side effects are not known before a trial is conducted, dose and schedule modifications may be required for participants if they develop side effects from the treatment or test. The therapy or test described in this clinical trial is intended for use by clinical oncologists in carefully structured settings, and may not prove to be more effective than standard treatment. A responsible investigator associated with this clinical trial should be consulted before using this protocol. Back to Top |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
NCI Home |
Text-Only Version |
Contact Us |
Policies |
Accessibility |
Viewing Files |
FOIA |
Site Help |
Site Map
|
A Service of the National Cancer Institute |