 |
|
Phase III Randomized Study of Vaginal Hysterectomy and Bilateral Salpingo-Oophorectomy (BSO) Via Laparoscopy Versus Total Abdominal Hysterectomy and BSO Via Conventional Laparotomy Plus Pelvic and Para-Aortic Lymph Node Sampling in Patients With Stage I or IIA, Grade I-III Endometrial Cancer or Uterine Cancer
Alternate Title Basic Trial Information Objectives Entry Criteria Expected Enrollment Outcomes Outline Published Results Trial Contact Information Registry Information
Alternate Title
Laparoscopic Surgery or Standard Surgery in Treating Patients With Endometrial Cancer or Cancer of the Uterus
Basic Trial Information
 |
Phase
 |
 |
 |
 |
Type
 |
 |
 |
 |
Status
 |
 |
 |
 |
Age
 |
 |
 |
 |
Sponsor
 |
 |
 |
 |
Protocol IDs
 |
 |
 |
 |

Phase III

|
 |
 |
 |

Treatment

|
 |
 |
 |

Closed

|
 |
 |
 |

18 and over

|
 |
 |
 |

NCI

|
 |
 |
 |

GOG-LAP2 NCT00002706

|
 |
|
Objectives - Compare the incidence of surgical complications, peri-operative morbidity, and mortality in patients with stage I or IIa, grade I-III endometrial cancer or uterine cancer undergoing surgical staging through laparoscopic assisted vaginal hysterectomy vs total abdominal hysterectomy.
- Compare the length of hospital stay after surgery in patients receiving these treatments.
- Compare the quality of life of patients receiving these treatments.
- Compare the incidence and location of disease recurrence in patients receiving these treatments.
Entry Criteria Disease Characteristics:
- Diagnosis of stage I or IIA, grade I-III endometrial adenocarcinoma or
uterine sarcoma
- Must be considered a candidate for surgery
- No contraindication to laparoscopy
- No clinical or chest x-ray evidence of metastasis beyond the uterine
corpus or
macroscopic involvement of the endocervix
Prior/Concurrent Therapy:
Biologic therapy: Chemotherapy: Endocrine therapy: Radiotherapy: - No prior pelvic or abdominal radiotherapy
Surgery: - See Disease Characteristics
- No prior retroperitoneal surgery
Patient Characteristics:
Age: Performance status: Life expectancy: Hematopoietic: - WBC at least 3,000/mm3
- Platelet count at least 100,000/mm3
Hepatic: - Bilirubin no greater than 1.5 times normal
- SGOT no greater than 3 times normal
Renal: - Creatinine no greater than 2.0 mg/dL
Other: - Prior malignancy allowed if no current evidence of
disease
- Not pregnant
Expected Enrollment 2550A total of 2,550 patients will be accrued for this study within at least 10
years. Outcomes Primary Outcome(s)Compare laparoscopy vs laparotomy surgical staging & results by conversion from laparoscopy to laparotomy Compare laparoscopy vs laparotomy surgical staging & results by length of operative time Compare laparoscopy vs laparotomy surgical staging & results by length of hospital stay Compare laparoscopy vs laparotomy surgical staging & results by transfusions Compare laparoscopy vs laparotomy surgical staging & results by deaths in 6 weeks Compare laparoscopy vs laparotomy surgical staging & results by readmission Compare laparoscopy vs laparotomy surgical staging & results by reoperations Compare laparoscopy vs laparotomy surgical staging & results by complications during operation and for 6 weeks after surgery Compare laparoscopy vs laparotomy for pathologic staging by nodes obtained from right and left pelvic and right and left para-aortic nodes Compare laparoscopy vs laparotomy for pathologic staging by pelvic washing for cytology node counts Compare laparoscopy vs laparotomy for pathologic staging by node positivity rates Compare laparoscopy vs laparotomy for pathologic staging by surgical stage after surgery Pattern of recurrence as assessed by the location of the first site of recurrence after 5 years Progression-free survival every 3 months for 2 years and every 6 months for 5 years
Secondary Outcome(s)Quality of life as assessed by FACT-G, body image, sexual function, SF-36, BPI, personal appearance, and return to work before surgery, at 1, 6 weeks, and 1 year
Outline This is a randomized, multicenter study. Patients are randomized to 1 of
2 treatment arms. - Arm I: Patients undergo vaginal hysterectomy and bilateral
salpingo- oophorectomy (BSO) via laparoscopy.
- Arm II: Patients undergo total abdominal hysterectomy and BSO via
conventional laparotomy.
Patients in both arms also undergo pelvic and para-aortic lymph node
sampling. Quality of life is assessed at baseline, at 1, 3, and 6 weeks, and then
at 6 months. Patients are followed at 6 weeks, every 3 months for 2 years, and then
every 6 months for 3 years. Published ResultsWalker JL, Piedmonte M, Spirtos N, et al.: Surgical staging of uterine cancer: randomized phase III trial of laparoscopy vs laparotomy--A Gynecologic Oncology Group study (GOG): preliminary results. [Abstract] J Clin Oncol 24 (Suppl 18): A-5010, 2006. Walker J, Piedmonte M, Spirtos N, et al.: Phase III trial of laparoscopy (scope) vs laparotomy (open) for surgical resection and comprehensive surgical staging of uterine cancer: a Gynecologic Oncology Group (GOG) study funded by NCI. [Abstract] Society of Gynecologic Oncologists, 2006 Annual Meeting on Women's Cancer, March 22-26, 2006, Palm Springs, CA. A-22, 2006.
Trial Contact Information
Trial Lead Organizations Gynecologic Oncology Group  |  |  | | Joan Walker, MD, Protocol chair |  | |  |
| Registry Information |  | | Official Title | | A Phase III Randomized Clinical Trial of Laparoscopic Pelvic and Para-Aortic Node Sampling With Vaginal Hysterectomy and BSO Versus Open Laparotomy With Pelvic and Para-Aortic Node Sampling and Abdominal Hysterectomy and BSO in Endometrial Adenocarcinoma, Clinical Stage I, IIA, Grade I, II, III |  | | Trial Start Date | | 1996-04-01 |  | | Registered in ClinicalTrials.gov | | NCT00002706 |  | | Date Submitted to PDQ | | 1996-04-01 |  | | Information Last Verified | | 2005-09-20 |  | | NCI Grant/Contract Number | | U10-CA27469 |
Note: The purpose of most clinical trials listed in this database is to test new cancer treatments, or new methods of diagnosing, screening, or preventing cancer. Because all potentially harmful side effects are not known before a trial is conducted, dose and schedule modifications may be required for participants if they develop side effects from the treatment or test. The therapy or test described in this clinical trial is intended for use by clinical oncologists in carefully structured settings, and may not prove to be more effective than standard treatment. A responsible investigator associated with this clinical trial should be consulted before using this protocol. Back to Top |
 |