 |
|
Phase III Randomized Study of Dexamethasone Versus Prednisolone During Induction Therapy and Prolonged Versus Conventional Duration Asparaginase During Consolidation and Late Intensification Therapy in Children With Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia or Lymphoblastic Non-Hodgkin's Lymphoma
Alternate Title Basic Trial Information Objectives Entry Criteria Expected Enrollment Outcomes Outline Published Results Related Publications Trial Contact Information Registry Information
Alternate Title
Combination Chemotherapy Plus Steroid Therapy in Treating Children With Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia or Lymphoblastic Non-Hodgkin's Lymphoma
Basic Trial Information
 |
Phase
 |
 |
 |
 |
Type
 |
 |
 |
 |
Status
 |
 |
 |
 |
Age
 |
 |
 |
 |
Sponsor
 |
 |
 |
 |
Protocol IDs
 |
 |
 |
 |

Phase III

|
 |
 |
 |

Treatment

|
 |
 |
 |

Active

|
 |
 |
 |

Under 18

|
 |
 |
 |

Other

|
 |
 |
 |

EORTC-58951 NCT00003728

|
 |
|
Objectives - Compare the value of dexamethasone (DM) vs prednisolone (PRDL) administered during induction therapy, in terms of event-free and overall survival, in children with acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) or lymphoblastic non-Hodgkin's lymphoma (LNHL).
- Assess the value of increasing the number of administrations of asparaginase during consolidation and late intensification therapy, in terms of disease-free and overall survival, in children without very high-risk (VHR) features.
- Compare the response rate in children treated with prephase therapy comprising DM vs PRDL and intrathecal methotrexate.
- Compare the incidence and grade of toxic effects of these treatment regimens in these children.
- Compare the long-term effects of these treatment regimens on growth and pubertal development, neurocognitive, cardiac, and endocrine function, and incidence of aseptic bone necrosis in these children.
- Evaluate the proportion of children with VHR disease when defined according to extended VHR criteria, and assess the prognostic importance of the new VHR features (cytogenetics and minimal-residual disease).
- Compare the feasibility of the VHR chemotherapy protocol in patients treated with DM vs PRDL.
Entry Criteria Disease Characteristics:
- Histologically confirmed acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) of FAB L1 or
L2
morphology
OR
- Histologically confirmed precursor B or precursor T lymphoblastic
non-Hodgkin's lymphoma (NHL)
- No diffuse large cell B-cell lymphoma, Burkitt's
lymphoma, or high-grade
B-cell lymphoma (Burkitt-like)
- Very low-risk (VLR) patients meeting 1 of the following criteria:
- ALL of B-cell lineage
- WBC less than 10,000/mm3
- Must meet 1 of the following conditions:
- DNA index greater than 1.16 and less than 1.50 and
chromosome number 51-66
or unknown
- DNA index not assessed and chromosome number 51-66
- DNA index greater than 1.16 and less than 1.50 and chromosome number is unknown
- Good response to prephase therapy
- Absence of t(9;22) or BCR/ABL, t(4;11)/MLL-AF4, or
11q23/MLL rearrangement
- No acute undifferentiated leukemia (AUL)
- No CNS or gonadal involvement
- Precursor B-lymphoblastic NHL stage I or II
OR
- Average risk (AR) patients:
- Must meet 1 of the following criteria:
- ALL with good response to prephase therapy who are
neither VLR or very high risk (VHR)
- VLR ALL with CNS involvement (CSF positive or negative)
- Precursor B-lymphoblastic NHL stage III or IV without
any VHR feature
- Precursor T-lymphoblastic NHL
- AR patients substratified in:
- AR1: B-cell lineage ALL with WBC less than
100,000/mm3
- Surreptitious or hemorrhagic CSF becoming
negative at D4 of prephase therapy
- Precursor B-lymphoblastic NHL stage III or IV
- Precursor T-lymphoblastic NHL stage I or II
- AR2: B-cell lineage ALL with WBC at least 100,000/mm3
- T-cell lineage ALL regardless of the WBC
- Overt or non-equivocal CNS involvement at D0 or
any CSF involvement
at D4
- Gonadal involvement
- Precursor T-lymphoblastic NHL stage III or IV
- Newborn Down syndrome patients with AR2 features are
assigned to the AR1 group
OR
- VHR patients:
- Must meet 1 of the following criteria:
- ALL patients meeting 1 of the following conditions:
- Poor response to prephase therapy (at least
1,000/mm3 blasts in peripheral
blood after completion of prephase therapy)
- t(9;22) or BCR/ABL
- t(4;11)/MLL-AF4
- 11q23/MLL rearrangement
- Near haploidy (no more than 34 chromosomes or DNA
index less than 0.7)
- Hypodiploid (35-40 chromosomes or DNA index 0.7 to
0.8)
- AUL
- For B lineage ALL: failure to achieve complete
response (CR) after
completion of protocol IA
- For T lineage ALL: failure to achieve CR or good
partial response (GPR)
after completion of protocol IA
- Minimal-residual disease (greater than 1,000
blasts/100,000 mononuclear
bone marrow cells) at evaluation of IA (day 35)
- NHL patients who failed to achieve CR or GPR after
completion of protocol IA
- All VHR patients are eligible for stem cell
transplantation except those whose sole VHR criterion is a poor response to
prephase therapy and who have
none of the following features:
-
T-cell immunophenotype
- Early B ALL (CD10 negative)
- WBC at least 100,000/mm3
- Newborn Down syndrome patients with VHR features are
assigned to AR1 group
[Note: A new classification scheme for adult non-Hodgkin's lymphoma has been adopted by PDQ. The terminology of "indolent" or "aggressive" lymphoma will replace the former terminology of "low", "intermediate", or "high" grade lymphoma. However, this protocol uses the former terminology.] Prior/Concurrent Therapy:
Biologic therapy: - See Disease Characteristics
Chemotherapy: Endocrine therapy: Radiotherapy: Surgery: Other: Patient Characteristics:
Age: Performance status: Life expectancy: Hematopoietic: - See Disease Characteristics
Hepatic: Renal: Expected Enrollment 1500A total of 1,400-1,500 patients will be accrued for this study within 5.5 years. Outcomes Primary Outcome(s)Event-free survival after first randomization Disease-free survival after second and third randomization
Secondary Outcome(s)Overall survival Response to prephase as assessed by number of blasts/mm³ in peripheral blood (< 1,000 vs ≥ 1,000) after randomization Response as assessed by bone marrow (BM) blasts after first randomization, at evaluation of prephase, and on day 15 of induction Toxicity and long-term toxicity as assessed by CTC v2
Outline This is a randomized, multicenter study. Patients are stratified for
prephase therapy according to center, disease (acute lymphoblastic leukemia
[ALL] vs non-Hodgkin's lymphoma [NHL]), WBC for ALL patients (less than
10,000/mm3 vs 10,000/mm3 to less than 100,000/mm3 vs greater than
100,000/mm3), stage for NHL patients (I or II vs III or IV), and whether
prephase already started (yes vs no). Patients are stratified for protocol II
therapy according to center, risk group (very low risk [VLR] vs average risk 1
[AR1] vs average risk 2 [AR2]), and treatment arm at first randomization. - Prephase: Patients are randomized to 1 of 2 treatment arms
- Arm I: Patients receive oral prednisolone (PRDL) twice daily or
methylprednisolone IV over 1 hour every 12 hours on days 1-7.
- Arm II: Patients receive dexamethasone (DM) orally twice daily or IV
over 1 hour every 12 hours on days 1-7.
Patients in both arms also receive methotrexate (MTX) intrathecally (IT)
on day 1.
- Protocol IA (days 8-35):
- VLR patients: Patients receive either oral PRDL or oral DM (depending on
earlier randomization) on days 8-28; vincristine (VCR) IV on days 8, 15, 22,
and 29; daunorubicin (DNR) IV over 1-4 hours on days 8 and 15; MTX IT on days
12 and 25; and asparaginase (ASP) IV over 1 hour or intramuscularly (IM) on
days 12, 15, 18, 22, 25, 29, 32, and 35.
- AR1 patients: Patients receive PRDL or DM, VCR, and ASP in the same
manner as VLR patients. Patients also receive DNR IV over 1-4 hours on days 8,
15, 22, and 29 and triple intrathecal therapy (TIT) comprising MTX, cytarabine
(ARA-C), and hydrocortisone on days 12 and 25.
- AR2 and very high-risk (VHR) patients:Patients receive PRDL or DM, VCR,
and ASP in the same manner as VLR patients and high-dose MTX (HD-MTX) IV over
24 hours on day 8; cyclophosphamide (CTX) IV over 1 hour on day 9; DNR IV over
1-4 hours on days 15, 22, and 29; and TIT on days 12 and 25.
Patients with VLR, AR1, or AR2 disease after protocol IA proceed to
protocol IB, interval therapy, and then protocol II. Patients with VHR disease
after protocol IA proceed to the VHR patient protocol.
- Protocol IB (for VLR, AR1, or AR2 patients): Patients with precursor B-cell ALL must be in complete remission (CR) and patients with
NHL must be in CR or good partial remission.
- VLR patients: Patients receive oral mercaptopurine (MP) on days 36-63; ARA-C IV on days 38-41, 45-48, 52-55, and 59-62; and MTX IT on days 38 and
52.
- AR1 and AR2 patients: Patients receive oral MP and ARA-C in the same manner as VLR patients; CTX IV over 1 hour on days 36 and 63; and TIT on days 38 and 52.
- VLR, AR1, and AR2 patients are also randomized to 1 of 2 treatment
arms.
- Arm I: Patients receive ASP IV or IM on days 38, 41, 45, 48, 52, 55, 59, and 62.
- Arm II: Patients receive no ASP.
- Interval therapy for VLR, AR1, or AR2 patients (begins 14 days after
completion of protocol I): Patients receive oral MP daily on days 1-56; HD-MTX IV over 24 hours on days 8, 22, 36, and 50; leucovorin calcium
(CF) (or levofolinic acid) orally or IV beginning 36 hours after initiation of MTX infusion and
repeating every 6 hours until hour 72 or until serum MTX level is adequate; and TIT on days 9, 23, 37, and 51.
- Protocol II (reinduction therapy IIA and reconsolidation therapy
IIB):
- VLR patients: Patients receive oral DM twice daily on days 1-21; VCR IV
on days 8, 15, 22, and 29; doxorubicin (DOX) IV over 1-4 hours on days 8 and
15; ARA-C IV on days 38-41 and 45-48; oral thioguanine (TG) once daily on days
36-49; and MTX IT on day 38.
- AR patients: Patients receive DM, VCR, ARA-C, and TG in the same manner
as VLR patients; DOX IV over 1-4 hours on days 8, 15, 22, and 29; CTX IV over
30-60 minutes on day 36; and TIT on day 38.
- VLR and AR patients are also randomized to 1 of 2 treatment arms.
- Arm I: Patients receive short-term ASP IV over 1 hour or IM on days 8,
11, 15, and 18.
- Arm II: Patients receive long-term ASP IV over 1 hour or IM on days 8,
11, 15, 18, 22, 25, 29, and 32.
- Maintenance therapy for VLR and AR patients (begins 14 days after
completion of protocol II):
- VLR patients: Patients receive oral MP once daily and oral MTX once
weekly for a total of 74 weeks.
- AR1 patients: Patients receive oral MP once daily on days 1-70; oral MTX on
days 1, 8, 15, 29, 36, 43, 50, 57, and 64; and TIT on day 22. Treatment
repeats every 10 weeks for 6 courses.
- AR2 patients: Patients receive MP and oral MTX (as for AR1 patients); HD-MTX IV over 24 hours on day 22; CF as in interval therapy on
days 23 and 24; and TIT and ASP on day 23.
After course 6, AR1 and AR2 patients receive further maintenance therapy comprising oral MP once daily and oral MTX once a week.
- VHR patient protocol (recommended treatment): Patients with VHR disease after protocol IA
receive reinforced consolidation (protocol IB') and VANDA regimens.
- Protocol IB': Patients receive oral DM twice daily on days 36-40 and
50-54; oral MP daily on days 36-40; VCR IV on days 36 and 41; HD-MTX IV over
24 hours on days 36 and 50; TIT on days 37 and 51; ARA-C IV over 3 hours every
12 hours on day 40; ASP IV over 1 hour or IM on days 41, 43, 45, 55, 57, and
59; oral TG once daily on days 50-54; vindesine (DAVA) IV on day 50; DNR IV
over 1-4 hours on day 54; and CTX IV over 1 hour on days 52 and 53. Patients
who achieve CR after protocol IB' proceed to VANDA
regimen.
- VANDA regimen: Patients receive oral DM twice daily on days 1-5; ARA-C
IV over 3 hours every 12 hours on days 1 and 2; mitoxantrone IV over 1 hour on
days 3 and 4; etoposide (VP-16) IV over 1 hour on days 3-5; TIT on day 5; and
ASP IV or IM on days 7, 9, 11, and 13.
After protocol IB' and VANDA, VHR patients who are eligible for stem
cell transplantation (SCT) and have an HLA-compatible familial donor undergo
transplantation. Patients who are ineligible for SCT receive interval therapy,
followed by 2 sequences of blocks R1, R2, and R3 (2 courses of each block for
a total of 6 courses), and then maintenance therapy for a total treatment
duration of 2 years.
- Interval therapy: Patients receive oral MP once daily on days 1-42;
HD-MTX IV over 24 hours on days 8, 22, and 36; CF as in interval
therapy (described above); and TIT on days 9, 23, and 37.
- Blocks R1, R2, and R3 (this sequential regimen is repeated once):
- R1: Patients receive oral DM twice daily and oral MP once daily on days
1-5; VCR IV on days 1 and 6; HD-MTX IV over 24 hours on day 1; CF as in
interval therapy on days 1 and 2; TIT on day 2; ARA-C IV over 3
hours every 12 hours on day 5; and ASP IV over 1 hour or IM on day 6.
- R2: Patients receive DM, HD-MTX, CF, TIT, and ASP as in block R1 and
oral TG once daily on days 1-5; DAVA IV on day 1; CTX IV over 1 hour on days 3
and 4; and DNR IV over 1-4 hours on day 5.
- R3: Patients receive DM and ASP as in block R1 and ARA-C IV over 3 hours
every 12 hours on days 1 and 2; VP-16 IV over 1 hour on days 3-5; and TIT on
day 5.
- Maintenance therapy: (begins 14 days after the second course of block R3
and ends 2 years after initiation of study therapy): Patients receive
treatment as in maintenance therapy for AR1 patients. Treatment repeats
every 10 weeks for 5 courses.
Patients are followed every 3 months for 5 years and then annually
thereafter. Published ResultsBertrand Y, Suciu S, Benoit Y, et al.: Dexamethasone(DEX)(6mg/sm/d) and prednisolone(PRED)(60mg/sm/d) in induction therapy of childhood ALL are equally effective: results of the 2nd interim analysis of EORTC trial 58951. [Abstract] Blood 112 (11): A-8, 2008. De Moerloose B, Suciu S, Bertrand Y, et al.: Improved outcome with pulses of vincristine and steroids in continuation therapy of children with average risk acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) and non Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL): final report of the EORTC randomized phase III trial 58951. [Abstract] Blood 112 (11): A-11, 2008. Sirvent N, Suciu S, Benoit Y, et al.: Prognostic significance of central nervous system (CNS) status of children with acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) treated without cranial irradiation: results of European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) Children Leukemia Group study 58951. [Abstract] Blood 112 (11): A-303, 2008. Bertrand Y, Goutagny MP, Poulat AL, et al.: Asparagine depletion, safety and antibody production after E coli asparaginase treatment in children with newly diagnosed acute lymphoblastic leukaemia treated with EORTC 58951 protocol: a single center report. [Abstract] Blood 110 (11): A-4337, 2007. Related PublicationsCavé H, Suciu S, Preudhomme C, et al.: Clinical significance of HOX11L2 expression linked to t(5;14)(q35;q32), of HOX11 expression, and of SIL-TAL fusion in childhood T-cell malignancies: results of EORTC studies 58881 and 58951. Blood 103 (2): 442-50, 2004.[PUBMED Abstract] Mirebeau D, Acquaviva C, Suciu S, et al.: Is CDKN2A +/- CDKN2B and MTAP inactivation of prognostic significance in B-precursor childhood acute lymphoblastic leukemia? Results of EORTC studies 58881 and 58951. [Abstract] Blood 104 (11): A-1076, 2004. Cavé H, Suciu S, Preudhomme C, et al.: HOX11L2 expression linked to t(5;14)(q35;q32) is not associated with poor prognosis in childhood T-ALL treated in EORTC trials 58 881 and 58 951. [Abstract] Blood 100(11 pt 1): A-576, 153a, 2002.
Trial Contact Information
Trial Lead Organizations European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer  |  |  | | Jacques Otten, MD, Study coordinator |  | |  | Trial Sites
 |
 |
 |
 |
| Belgium |
 |
| |
Antwerp |
 |
| | | | Ziekenhuis Netwerk Antwerpen Middelheim |
| | | Contact Person | |
|
| |
Brussels |
 |
| | | Academisch Ziekenhuis der Vrije Universiteit Brussel |
| | | Contact Person | |
| | | Hopital Universitaire Des Enfants Reine Fabiola |
| | | Contact Person | |
|
| |
Ghent |
 |
| | | Ghent University |
| | | Contact Person | |
| | | Universitair Ziekenhuis Gent |
| | | Contact Person | |
|
| |
Leuven |
 |
| | | U.Z. Gasthuisberg |
| | | Contact Person | |
|
| |
Liege |
 |
| | | Centre Hospitalier Regional de la Citadelle |
| | | Contact Person | |
|
| |
Montegnee |
 |
| | | Clinique de l'Esperance |
| | | Contact Person | |
|
| France |
 |
| |
Angers |
 |
| | | | Centre Hospitalier Regional et Universitaire d'Angers |
| | | Contact Person | |
|
| |
Besancon |
 |
| | | CHR de Besancon - Hopital Saint-Jacques |
| | | Contact Person | |
|
| |
Caen |
 |
| | | CHU de Caen |
| | | Contact Person | |
|
| |
Grenoble |
 |
| | | CHU de Grenoble - Hopital de la Tronche |
| | | Contact Person | |
|
| |
Lyon |
 |
| | | Hopital Debrousse |
| | | Contact Person | |
|
| |
Montpellier |
 |
| | | Hopital Arnaud de Villeneuve |
| | | Contact Person | |
|
| |
Nantes |
 |
| | | CHR Hotel Dieu |
| | | Contact Person | |
|
| |
Nice |
 |
| | | Hopital de l'Archet CHU de Nice |
| | | Contact Person | |
|
| |
Paris |
 |
| | | CHU - Hopital Robert Debre |
| | | Contact Person | |
|
| |
Poitiers |
 |
| | | Hopital Jean Bernard |
| | | Contact Person | |
|
| |
Reims |
 |
| | | Hopital Americain |
| | | Contact Person | |
|
| |
Strasbourg |
 |
| | | Hopital Universitaire Hautepierre |
| | | Contact Person | |
|
| |
Toulouse |
 |
| | | Hopital des Enfants |
| | | Contact Person | |
|
| Portugal |
 |
| |
Porto |
 |
| | | | Hospital Escolar San Joao |
| | | Contact Person | |
| | | Instituto Portugues de Oncologia Centro do Porto, SA |
| | | Contact Person | |
|
| Registry Information |  | | Official Title | | The Value of Dexamethasone Versus Prednisolone During Induction and Maintenance Therapy of Prolonged Versus Conventional Duration of L-Asparaginase Therapy During Consolidation and Late Intensification, and of Corticosteroid + VCR Pulses During Maintenance in Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia and Lymphoblastic Non-Hodgkin Lymphoma of Childhood |  | | Trial Start Date | | 1998-12-08 |  | | Trial Completion Date | | 2008-05-31 (estimated) |  | | Registered in ClinicalTrials.gov | | NCT00003728 |  | | Date Submitted to PDQ | | 1998-12-29 |  | | Information Last Verified | | 2008-04-13 |
Note: The purpose of most clinical trials listed in this database is to test new cancer treatments, or new methods of diagnosing, screening, or preventing cancer. Because all potentially harmful side effects are not known before a trial is conducted, dose and schedule modifications may be required for participants if they develop side effects from the treatment or test. The therapy or test described in this clinical trial is intended for use by clinical oncologists in carefully structured settings, and may not prove to be more effective than standard treatment. A responsible investigator associated with this clinical trial should be consulted before using this protocol. Back to Top |
 |