 |
|
Phase III Randomized Study of Induction Chemotherapy Followed By Cytogenetic Risk-Adapted Intensification Therapy Followed By Interleukin-2 Versus No Further Therapy in Patients With Previously Untreated Acute Myeloid Leukemia
Alternate Title Basic Trial Information Objectives Entry Criteria Expected Enrollment Outcomes Outline Published Results Related Publications Trial Contact Information Registry Information
Alternate Title
Combination Chemotherapy With or Without PSC 833, Peripheral Stem Cell Transplantation, and/or Interleukin-2 in Treating Patients With Acute Myeloid Leukemia
Basic Trial Information
 |
Phase
 |
 |
 |
 |
Type
 |
 |
 |
 |
Status
 |
 |
 |
 |
Age
 |
 |
 |
 |
Sponsor
 |
 |
 |
 |
Protocol IDs
 |
 |
 |
 |

Phase III

|
 |
 |
 |

Treatment

|
 |
 |
 |

Closed

|
 |
 |
 |

15 to 59

|
 |
 |
 |

NCI

|
 |
 |
 |

CALGB-19808 CALGB-19808, NCT00006363

|
 |
|
Objectives - Compare the effect of induction chemotherapy with or without PSC 833 (induction chemotherapy [arm II] closed to accrual as of 8/11/03) on disease-free survival and overall survival in patients with previously untreated acute myeloid leukemia.
- Determine whether post-consolidation immunotherapy with low-dose interleukin-2 (IL-2) and continuous/intermittent high-dose IL-2 improves disease-free survival and overall survival in patients who achieve first complete remission.
- Determine the effectiveness of three courses of high-dose cytarabine (HiDAC) to cure patients with core-binding factor leukemias.
- Determine the feasibility and efficacy of intensive post-remission chemotherapy using peripheral blood stem cell transplantation or a novel intensification sequence of HiDAC/high-dose etoposide/filgrastim (G-CSF) followed by two courses of HiDAC in patients with unfavorable cytogenetics in complete remission.
Entry Criteria Disease Characteristics:
- Histologically confirmed acute myeloid leukemia (AML) with more than 20%
blasts in bone marrow by WHO and/or FAB classifications
- Antecedent myelodysplasia allowed if there was no
bone marrow biopsy showing
myelodysplastic syndromes over the previous 3 months
- No acute promyelocytic leukemia (M3)
- No therapy-related myelodysplastic syndromes or AML
- No chronic myeloproliferative disorder
- Must also be enrolled on CALGB 9665 unless inaspirable and mandatory
leukemic
cells cannot be obtained from the blood
Prior/Concurrent Therapy:
Biologic therapy: - Prior emergency leukapheresis allowed
- Prior growth factor/cytokine support allowed
- No other prior biologic therapy
- Other concurrent myeloid growth factors allowed only if
prognostic factors predictive of clinical deterioration are present such as the
following:
- Pneumonia
- Hypotension
- Multiorgan dysfunction (sepsis syndrome)
- Fungal infection
Chemotherapy: - Prior emergency treatment for hyperleukocytosis with
hydroxyurea allowed
- No other prior chemotherapy
- No other concurrent chemotherapy
Endocrine therapy: - No prior endocrine therapy
- No concurrent hormonal therapy other than steroids for adrenal
failure or septic shock or hormones for conditions not related to
disease (e.g., insulin for diabetes or estrogens or progestins for
gynecologic indications)
Radiotherapy: - One dose of prior cranial radiotherapy for CNS leukostasis
allowed
- No other prior radiotherapy
- No concurrent radiotherapy
Surgery: Patient Characteristics:
Age: Performance status: Life expectancy: Hematopoietic: Hepatic: Renal: Other: - Not pregnant or nursing
- Fertile patients must use effective contraception
Expected Enrollment 720A total of 720 patients will be accrued for this study within 4 years. Outcomes Primary Outcome(s)Comparison of disease-free and overall survival
Secondary Outcome(s)Toxicity
Outline This is a randomized, multicenter study. - Induction Therapy:Patients are randomized to 1 of 2 treatment
arms. (Arm II closed to accrual as of 8/11/03.)
- Arm I: Patients receive cytarabine IV continuously on days 1-7
and daunorubicin IV over 5-10 minutes followed by etoposide IV over 2
hours on days 1-3. Patients with 20% or greater bone marrow cellularity and
greater than 5% leukemia blasts at the end of the first course receive a
second course of cytarabine IV continuously on days 1-5 and daunorubicin IV
over 5-10 minutes followed by etoposide IV over 2 hours on days 1 and
2.
- Arm II (closed to accrual as of 8/11/03): Patients receive PSC 833 IV continuously on days 1-3
and cytarabine, daunorubicin, and etoposide as in arm I. Patients with
20% or greater bone marrow cellularity and greater than 5% leukemia blasts at
the end of the first course receive a second course of PSC 833 IV
continuously on days 1 and 2 and cytarabine, daunorubicin, and etoposide as in
arm I.
- Intensification Therapy: Patients in complete remission receive
intensification therapy. Therapy begins no earlier than 2 weeks and no later
than 4 weeks after complete remission is attained. Patients are stratified
according to cytogenetics (favorable [t(8;21)(q22;q22) or inv(16)(p13;q22) or
t(16;16)(p13;q22)] vs unfavorable [all other karyotypes]).
- Favorable: Patients receive high-dose cytarabine (HiDAC) IV over 3
hours every 12 hours on days 1, 3, and 5. Treatment repeats no earlier than
28 days after the prior course and no later than 14 days after
hematopoietic recovery for two more courses.
- Unfavorable: Patients are further divided into two groups based on
ability to receive peripheral blood stem cell transplantation (PBSCT) (yes vs
no).
- PBSCT group: Patients receive etoposide IV continuously and HiDAC IV
over 2 hours every 12 hours on days 1-4. Patients also receive filgrastim
(G-CSF) subcutaneously (SC) daily beginning on day 14 and continuing
until peripheral blood stem cell (PBSC) collection is completed. Patients
who are not able to undergo PBSCT after HiDAC/etoposide continue
treatment in the non-PBSCT group. At least 4 weeks after
HiDAC/etoposide recovery, patients receive oral busulfan every 6 hours on days -7 to
-4 and etoposide IV over 4 hours on day -3 prior to PBSCT. Patients
receive autologous PBSC infusion on day 0. Patients also receive G-CSF
SC beginning on day 0 and continuing until hematopoietic recovery.
- Non-PBSCT group: Patients receive etoposide, HiDAC, and G-CSF as in
the PBSCT group. After hematopoietic recovery, patients then receive
HiDAC IV over 3 hours every 12 hours on days 1, 3, and 5. Treatment
repeats no earlier than 28 days after prior course and no later than 14 days
after hematopoietic recovery for one more course.
- Immunotherapy: Patients are again randomized to 1 of 2 treatment
arms.
- Arm I: Patients begin therapy no later than 120 days after the first
day of the last course of HiDAC treatment OR day 0 of PBSCT. Patients
receive low-dose interleukin-2 (IL-2) SC on days 1-14, 19-28, 33-42, 47-56, 61-70,
and 75-90. In addition, patients receive high-dose IL-2 SC on days
15-17, 29-31, 43-45, 57-59, and 71-73.
- Arm II: Patients are observed and receive no further therapy.
Patients are followed at 1 month, every 2 months for 2 years, every 6
months for 2 years, and then annually for 6 years. Published ResultsKolitz JE, Hars V, DeAngelo DJ, et al.: Phase III trial of immunotherapy with recombinant interleukin-2 (rIL-2) versus observation in patients < 60 years with acute myeloid leukemia (AML) in first remission (CR1): preliminary results from Cancer and Leukemia Group B (CALGB) 19808. [Abstract] Blood 110 (11): A-157, 2007. Radmacher MD, Marcucci G, Paschka P, et al.: MicroRNA (miR) expression signatures in molecular subsets of cytogenetically normal (CN) acute myeloid leukemia (AML): a Cancer and Leukemia Group B (CALGB) study. [Abstract] J Clin Oncol 25 (Suppl 18): A-7010, 359s, 2007. Kolitz JE, George SL, Marcucci G, et al.: A randomized comparison of induction therapy for untreated acute myeloid leukemia (AML) in patients < 60 years using p-glycoprotein (Pgp) modulation with valspodar (PSC833): preliminary results of Cancer and Leukemia Group B study 19808. [Abstract] Blood 106 (11): A-407, 2005. Related PublicationsLanger C, Maharry K, Mrózek K, et al.: Low Meningioma 1 (MN1) gene expression to predict outcome in cytogenetically normal acute myeloid leukemia (CN-AML): A Cancer and Leukemia Group B (CALGB) study. [Abstract] J Clin Oncol 26 (Suppl 15): A-7011, 2008. Langer C, Radmacher MD, Ruppert AS, et al.: High BAALC expression associates with other molecular prognostic markers, poor outcome, and a distinct gene-expression signature in cytogenetically normal patients younger than 60 years with acute myeloid leukemia: a Cancer and Leukemia Group B (CALGB) study. Blood 111 (11): 5371-9, 2008.[PUBMED Abstract] Paschka P, Marcucci G, Ruppert AS, et al.: Wilms Tumor 1 Gene Mutations Independently Predict Poor Outcome in Adults With Cytogenetically Normal Acute Myeloid Leukemia: A Cancer and Leukemia Group B Study. J Clin Oncol : , 2008.[PUBMED Abstract] Langer C, Ruppert, AS, Radmacher MD, et al.: High BAALC expression associates with other molecular prognostic markers, poor outcome and a distinct gene expression signature in cytogenetically normal acute myeloid leukemia (CN AML): a Cancer and Leukemia Group B (CALGB) study. [Abstract] J Clin Oncol 25 (Suppl 18): A-7013, 360s, 2007. Marcucci G, Maharry K, Radmacher MD, et al.: Gene and microRNA (miRNA) expression signatures and prognostic significance of CEBPA mutations in cytogenetically normal (CN) acute myeloid leukemia (AML) with high-risk molecular features: a Cancer and Leukemia Group B (CALGB) study . [Abstract] Blood 110 (11): A-104, 2007. Marcucci G, Maharry K, Whitman SP, et al.: High expression levels of the ETS-related gene, ERG, predict adverse outcome and improve molecular risk-based classification of cytogenetically normal acute myeloid leukemia: a Cancer and Leukemia Group B Study. J Clin Oncol 25 (22): 3337-43, 2007.[PUBMED Abstract] Whitman SP, Ruppert AS, Marcucci G, et al.: Long-term disease-free survivors with cytogenetically normal acute myeloid leukemia and MLL partial tandem duplication: a Cancer and Leukemia Group B study. Blood 109 (12): 5164-7, 2007.[PUBMED Abstract] Paschka P, Marcucci G, Ruppert AS, et al.: Adverse prognostic significance of KIT mutations in adult acute myeloid leukemia with inv(16) and t(8;21): a Cancer and Leukemia Group B Study. J Clin Oncol 24 (24): 3904-11, 2006.[PUBMED Abstract] Kolitz JE, George SL, Baer MR, et al.: P-glycoprotein (Pgp) modulation in untreated acute myeloid leukemia (AML): Cancer and Leukemia Group B (CALGB) trials in younger and older adults. Ann Hematol 83 (Suppl 1): S103-4, 2004.[PUBMED Abstract]
Trial Contact Information
Trial Lead Organizations Cancer and Leukemia Group B  |  |  | | Jonathan Kolitz, MD, Protocol chair |  | |  | | Richard Larson, MD, Protocol co-chair |  | | Ph: 773-702-6783; 888-824-0200 |
|  |
| Registry Information |  | | Official Title | | Phase III Randomized Study Of Induction Chemotherapy With or Without MDR-Modulation With PSC-833 (NSC #648265, IND #41121) Followed By Cytogenetic Risk-Adapted Intensification Therapy Followed By Immunotherapy With RIL-2 (NSC #373364, IND #1969) vs. Observation In Previously Untreated Patients With AML < 60 Years |  | | Trial Start Date | | 2000-11-15 |  | | Registered in ClinicalTrials.gov | | NCT00006363 |  | | Date Submitted to PDQ | | 2000-08-16 |  | | Information Last Verified | | 2006-04-14 |  | | NCI Grant/Contract Number | | CA31946 |
Note: The purpose of most clinical trials listed in this database is to test new cancer treatments, or new methods of diagnosing, screening, or preventing cancer. Because all potentially harmful side effects are not known before a trial is conducted, dose and schedule modifications may be required for participants if they develop side effects from the treatment or test. The therapy or test described in this clinical trial is intended for use by clinical oncologists in carefully structured settings, and may not prove to be more effective than standard treatment. A responsible investigator associated with this clinical trial should be consulted before using this protocol. Back to Top |
 |