WHI Estrogen-Alone Data Indicate No Overall Benefit for Disease Prevention, No Apparent Increase in Cancer Risk Data from the Women's Health Initiative (WHI) study to investigate the effect of estrogen-alone hormone replacement therapy (HRT) on the incidence of chronic disease indicate that there is no overall benefit for disease prevention. Specifically for cancer, it showed no effect on the risk of breast or colorectal cancer. Use of estrogen did, however, increase the risk of stroke by 39 percent, a finding that prompted the decision in February by the National Institutes of Health to bring the trial to a premature end. It was slated to run through March 2005. The trial's stoppage was initially announced in early March, but the complete data from the study were not published until this week in the Journal of the American Medical Association (JAMA). Of particular interest to the cancer community is the finding that estrogen did not increase participants' risk of breast cancer during the study period. In fact, there was a trend, though not statistically significant, toward reduction in breast cancer incidence. Overall, 218 of the more than 10,000 postmenopausal women in the study - all of whom had undergone hysterectomy - developed breast cancer. Read moreCIRB to be Extended to Support Pediatric Trials The annual spring meeting of the Children's Oncology Group (COG) was held in Washington, D.C., earlier this month, and I had the privilege of learning about some of the exciting work that COG researchers are currently conducting. Representative Bill Young (R-Fla.) and I had the honor of addressing the membership during its March 31 luncheon, when Rep. Young received the organization's Congressional Champion for Childhood Cancer Award in recognition of his pivotal role as Chair of the House Appropriations Committee and his leadership in supporting COG's research program to identify more effective treatments for children with cancer. COG is a National Cancer Institute-supported clinical trials cooperative group devoted to translational and clinical research on childhood and adolescent cancers. It develops and coordinates clinical trials conducted through its 238 member institutions, which include cancer centers in the United States, Canada, Europe, and Australia. COG enrolls approximately 4,000 children and adolescents in treatment studies annually and has 70-80 studies open to patient accrual each year. Read more
|
WHI Estrogen-Alone Data Indicate No Overall Benefit for Disease Prevention, No Apparent Increase in Cancer Risk Data from the Women's Health Initiative (WHI) study to investigate the effect of estrogen-alone hormone replacement therapy (HRT) on the incidence of chronic disease indicate that there is no overall benefit for disease prevention. Specifically for cancer, it showed no effect on the risk of breast or colorectal cancer. Use of estrogen did, however, increase the risk of stroke by 39 percent, a finding that prompted the decision in February by the National Institutes of Health to bring the trial to a premature end. It was slated to run through March 2005. The trial's stoppage was initially announced in early March, but the complete data from the study were not published until this week in the Journal of the American Medical Association (JAMA). Of particular interest to the cancer community is the finding that estrogen did not increase participants' risk of breast cancer during the study period. In fact, there was a trend, though not statistically significant, toward reduction in breast cancer incidence. Overall, 218 of the more than 10,000 postmenopausal women in the study - all of whom had undergone hysterectomy - developed breast cancer. The finding of reduced incidence "was unanticipated," the WHI study authors wrote, and contrasts with the finding from several other HRT trials, including a separate WHI study of estrogen-progestin combination therapy that was stopped two years ago. In that study, which involved postmenopausal women who had not had a hysterectomy, participants on HRT were at increased risk of breast cancer and decreased risk of colorectal cancer. And in a large observational trial, the Million Women Study, published last August in The Lancet, women on either estrogen alone or an estrogen-progestin combination had a significantly increased risk of breast cancer, especially those in the latter group. All women in the WHI estrogen-alone trial underwent annual clinical breast exams and mammograms, so screening differences between the placebo and treatment groups could not account for the discrepancy with the other trials, the authors wrote." This is a complicated study with a number of variables," noted Dr. Leslie Ford, associate director for clinical research at NCI's Division of Cancer Prevention. "There are still unanswered questions related to the baseline breast cancer risk of the women, the stage and severity of breast cancer diagnosed, and the long-term follow-up of the women. Additionally, only one type of estrogen preparation was tested." Postmenopausal women who have had a hysterectomy can find some peace of mind in the fact that short-term, low-dose HRT may provide effective relief of menopausal symptoms without an increase in breast cancer risk," Dr. Ford continued. "But it's important to remember that the increase in stroke in the study group was significant and that the morbidity associated with stroke can be quite severe." Extended follow-up of study participants is planned, and "analyses of [participants'] breast cancer characteristics… may provide additional insight," the authors wrote. Speaking about the WHI estrogen-alone trial as a whole, National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute Acting Director Dr. Barbara Alving said, "These findings confirm that estrogen-alone therapy should not be used to prevent chronic disease. We believe the findings support current FDA recommendations that hormone therapy only be used to treat menopausal symptoms and that it be used at the smallest effective dose for the shortest possible time." In an accompanying editorial in JAMA, Drs. Stephen B. Hulley and Deborah Grady, both from the University of California, San Francisco, agreed with Dr. Alving's assessment. "In the absence of evidence for an overall net benefit of postmenopausal treatment with estrogen alone, and with the evidence that estrogen plus progestin is harmful, neither therapy should be used for preventing disease." |
CIRB to be Extended to Support Pediatric Trials The annual spring meeting of the Children's Oncology Group (COG) was held in Washington, D.C., earlier this month, and I had the privilege of learning about some of the exciting work that COG researchers are currently conducting. Representative Bill Young (R-Fla.) and I had the honor of addressing the membership during its March 31 luncheon, when Rep. Young received the organization's Congressional Champion for Childhood Cancer Award in recognition of his pivotal role as Chair of the House Appropriations Committee and his leadership in supporting COG's research program to identify more effective treatments for children with cancer. COG is a National Cancer Institute-supported clinical trials cooperative group devoted to translational and clinical research on childhood and adolescent cancers. It develops and coordinates clinical trials conducted through its 238 member institutions, which include cancer centers in the United States, Canada, Europe, and Australia. COG enrolls approximately 4,000 children and adolescents in treatment studies annually and has 70-80 studies open to patient accrual each year. COG's primary objectives are to define optimal treatments for children and adolescents with cancer through clinical trials; support and perform research into the etiology and biology of childhood cancers that will translate into more effective treatments; improve patients' quality of life and ensure patient access to the most advanced treatments available; and finally, share findings among member institutions and the larger cancer community to accelerate the search for cures for all major types of childhood cancer.COG and NCI recently announced the establishment of a Pediatric Central Institutional Review Board (PedCIRB). Led by Dr. Gregory H. Reaman, COG conducted a survey of its member institutions and found a high level of support for a pediatric central IRB. NCI responded to this interest by agreeing to include pediatric protocols within NCI's Central IRB (CIRB) Initiative. PedCIRB will provide for quality review of protocols by utilizing the childhood cancer expertise available through a national IRB and will improve access to phase II and III clinical trials for children and adolescents with cancer. These priorities are fully congruent with those of the CIRB Initiative being led by NCI's Cancer Therapy Evaluation Program. The CIRB concept has encountered some resistance in the adult clinical research community. Primarily, the slower adoption is a consequence of the reluctance of local IRBs to relinquish the responsibility they hold for reviewing patient safety within their own institutions and perceived indemnification issues related to central review. The CIRB Initiative aims to provide consistent standards for safeguarding the welfare of human research subjects, improve patient and physician access to clinical trials, and give participating institutions access to a "facilitated review process," thereby reducing local administrative burdens. The difficulties local IRBs have faced in shouldering the weight of administrative and regulatory demands on their own are known to constitute a barrier to the swift and efficient initiation and completion of large-scale, multicenter trials (See Christian MC, et al. New England Journal of Medicine 2002, 346:1405-1408). Countering these limiting factors, broadening the purview of the CIRB Initiative to enhance the development and delivery of improved therapeutics for pediatric cancer patients will have a synergistic effect on accelerating development and delivery across the spectrum of all cancer types. Such synergies will prove crucial to meeting the challenge goal of eliminating the suffering and death due to cancer by 2015. Implementation of the PedCIRB will occur rapidly, with the first COG protocols planned for review in November 2004. Phase II and III trials represent the crucial final steps before innovative cancer treatments can take their place as part of the clinical armamentarium. The expanded CIRB Initiative will provide an unprecedented level of support for accelerating these final steps of the discovery-development-delivery continuum. I would like to reiterate NCI's strong commitment to the entire cancer clinical research community to provide the infrastructure and support to facilitate continued improvement and expansion of all clinical trials. Dr. Andrew C. von Eschenbach |
Notice of Availability of Administrative Supplements for Disseminating Evidence-Based Intervention Research Products NOT-CA-04-011 NCI is requesting applications for administrative supplements for NCI-funded cancer control intervention research R01, P01, P50, U01, and U19 grants. These supplements have been designed to provide 1-year funding to cancer control investigators whose intervention efficacy data have been analyzed and who are conducting peer-reviewed research (with an active NCI grant award) related to the intervention program proposed for dissemination. The supplements will support R01, P01, P50, U01, and U19 award mechanisms. For more information see http://cri.nci.nih.gov/4abst.cfm?initiativeparfa_id=1980 Inquiries should be addressed to the NCI Program Director for the particular R01, P01, P50, U01, or U19 for which the supplement is being requested. Inter-Institute Program for the Development of AIDS-Related Therapeutics NOT-AI-04-024 The Inter-Institute Program (IIP) for the Development of AIDS-Related Therapeutics is cosponsored by the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases and NCI. Investigators are invited to submit proposals to this therapeutics development program. The IIP is designed to help AIDS research investigators facilitate the preclinical development of: (1) therapies for the treatment of HIV disease, AIDS-associated malignancies, opportunistic infections, and tuberculosis associated with AIDS and (2) microbicide-based prevention strategies for HIV. The IIP does not fund grants but instead provides IIP drug development resources. For more information see http://cri.nci.nih.gov/4abst.cfm?initiativeparfa_id=1981 Inquiries: Inter-Institute Program Coordinator, iip@dtpax2.ncifcrf.gov |
International Fellowship Program Advancing Science and Extending Good Will In 1959, Dr. Mieczyslaw "Ray" Chorazy came to the United States from Poland on a Rockefeller Foundation fellowship to conduct research at the University of Wisconsin on DNA uptake by eukaryotic cells. He returned to the states a little more than a year later to do research at Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center on leukemic chromosomes under another Rockefeller Foundation fellowship that lasted 15 months. Other work in the United States followed, including a four-year stint in the early 1990s, during which he was involved in research at NCI on lung cancer genetics for three months each year." I regard my several research visits to the states as the most enjoyable and fruitful time of my life," says Dr. Chorazy, former head of the Tumor Biology Department at the Centre of Oncology, Maria Sklodowska-Curie Memorial Institute, in Gliwice, Poland. The opportunities presented by these fellowships, and the assistance Dr. Chorazy's U.S. colleagues have offered him and his colleagues over the years, spurred him to pursue an ambitious project that is having tremendous results. With the partial support of the NCI Office of International Affairs (OIA), the medical center in Gliwice now offers its own small fellowship program. The program is geared toward young cancer researchers from the former Soviet republics of Ukraine, Belarus, and Lithuania - all of which have seen the kind of tumult Poland experienced throughout much of the 1970s and 80s, when it was ruled by a communist regime and experienced significant economic and social upheaval." We in Poland survived the hardest economic times, thanks to continued help from our Western colleagues," he says. Help from Western research communities came in various forms, including reagents and biomaterials, subscriptions to scientific journals, and supplies and replacement parts for laboratory equipment. He and his colleagues also were often invited to attend international meetings and conferences and were charged lower registration fees - or not charged at all. "The U.S. system of grants and fellowships has been so helpful and friendly," Dr. Chorazy adds. "In a sense, I see our fellowship program as a way to repay the moral debt that we owe to our friends in the West who helped us at the time of darkness and depression."
In 1999, former OIA director Dr. Federico Welsch worked with Dr. Chorazy and his colleagues to establish fellowship support for two researchers per year. In 2003, two additional fellowships were added. Operating the program out of Gliwice - which is in the south of Poland, near the borders of the Czech Republic and Slovakia - allows researchers who most likely would not have had the opportunity for fellowships in the United States or other countries (because of cost and other logistical issues) to gain important experiences, explains OIA international programs officer Dr. James McKearney. The fellowship program in Gliwice fits well into OIA's goal of helping developing countries build their capacity for research, says OIA Director Dr. Joe Harford. "The cancer burden is growing in the developing world and, even today, approximately 90 percent of cancer cases occur outside the United States," said Dr. Harford. "Human capacity is lacking in many parts of the world, so training scientists is a key component of the globalization of cancer research." The fellowship program "has raised unprecedented interest among our Eastern neighbors," Dr. Chorazy says. "I have been receiving constant requests both for short- and long-term fellowships from researchers in the Ukraine, Belarus, Lithuania, Slovakia, and other countries." The U.S.-funded fellowships have some advantages over those funded by the European Union (EU), Dr. Chorazy explains, because the latter require having to navigate through significant amounts of bureaucracy and red tape and often don't involve much person-to-person interaction between EU administrators and prospective candidates. From the early 1990s to the present, approximately 20 fellows have participated in short-term (up to 3 months) and long-term (up to 3 years) fellowships in Gliwice. Two Ukrainian fellows recently received their Ph.D. degrees, and a fellow from Belarus will defend her Ph.D. dissertation in the near future. There are four fellows in Gliwice for 2004, two from Belarus and one each from the Ukraine and Lithuania." We are lucky to have these young researchers with us. They are well-trained, very industrious, and manually gifted scientists," Dr. Chorazy says. "The researchers at the Centre of Oncology in Gliwice and our visiting fellows are very much indebted to NCI-OIA for the help and assistance they have provided. In this more and more complex world, such friendly human relations are the most heartwarming values." |
Study of Combination Biological Therapy for Metastatic Colorectal Cancer Name of the Trial
Why Is This Trial Important? Monoclonal antibodies, such as cetuximab (Erbitux) and bevacizumab (Avastin), are playing an increasingly important role in cancer therapy. Cetuximab targets a protein that some types of cancer need for growth. Bevacizumab interferes with the ability of a tumor to establish a blood supply. Combining cetuximab and bevacizumab with traditional chemotherapy drugs, such as irinotecan, may slow the progression of disease or even improve survival for patients with metastatic colorectal cancer. "With this trial, we're taking the two newest targeted therapies for colorectal cancer and combining them to see if they are more effective than standard chemotherapy, either as a stand-alone treatment or in combination with irinotecan," said Dr. Saltz. Who Can Join This Trial? Where Is This Trial Taking Place? Who to Contact An archive of "Featured Clinical Trial" columns is available at http://cancer.gov/clinicaltrials/ft-all-featured-trials. |
Drs. Weissman and Staudt Elected to Association of American Physicians Dr. Weissman is an international leader in regulated membrane receptor turnover and ubiquitin-mediated protein degradation, including identification of RING finger proteins as ubiquitin ligases. He also played key roles in the characterization of T-cell antigen receptor (TCR) and cloned and characterized the TCR zeta chain - a key TCR signaling component. Dr. Staudt cloned and characterized the lymphoid-restricted transcription factor Oct-2. In his laboratory, Dr. Staudt and colleagues study the molecular pathogenesis of human lymphoid malignancies. To provide a new molecular basis for the diagnosis of malignancies, his laboratory is exploiting DNA microarray technology to profile gene expression in these cancers on a genomic scale. Von Hoff Discusses New Approaches to Treating Cancer Dr. Von Hoff discussed his establishment of the community oncology model at the Arizona Comprehensive Cancer Center, which integrates local oncologists with cancer centers to enable them to participate in early phase clinical studies and helps "provide all of the patients in the community access to all therapies." His model has dramatically increased patient accrual to trials and successfully integrated the community physician into cutting-edge clinical science. Dr. Von Hoff also described the transformational rise of microarrays to analyze tumors for upregulated gene products as the conventional approach in identifying pharmacological targets. He also noted that he sees critical targets in specific downregulated gene products as well - he referred to these as "nontargets." To help mine the valuable data provided by "nontargets," Dr. Von Hoff is developing a national database that will contain information from rapid-throughput screening to determine which known drugs are effective against tumors with downregulated genes.
Newman won numerous science writing awards for the many articles, news releases, background materials, and brochures she wrote or produced. She managed the preparation of such major reports as Horizons of Cancer Research, published under the sponsorship of the National Cancer Advisory Board, and served as liaison to the NIH, Department of Health and Human Services, and NCI-designated cancer centers. She spearheaded the press office's development of its online "NewsCenter" and an online magazine for the NCI Web site. She also served, since 1999, as program advisor to the planning committee for the President's Cancer Panel. She developed communication strategies for the panel's regional meetings and performed literature research and analyses to guide their efforts in cancer patient survivorship and translational research. NCI at Share the Health NCI is pleased to participate in this event, which this year will include scientific poster sessions featuring the work of students from Takoma Park Middle School and Montgomery Blair High School. To encourage and stimulate these students' interest in science, NCI will have an exhibit at the expo and conduct presentations and mini-labs for young people. This free event will be held from 10:00 a.m. to 3:30 p.m. on the 24th. Free shuttle service will be available from the Silver Spring Metro that day from 9:30 a.m. to 4:30 p.m. More information is available on the Share the Health Web site at http://sharethehealth.od.nih.gov/index.asp. |
This is a list of selected scientific meetings sponsored by NCI and other organizations. For locations and times and a more complete list of scientific meetings, including NCI's weekly seminars and presentations open to the public, see the NCI Calendar of Scientific Meetings at http://calendar.cancer.gov.
NCI Exhibits | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||

The program was initially launched in the early 1990s with funds from several Polish sources and the European Association for Cancer Research. Although NCI has a long-standing relationship with Poland's Institute of Oncology, dating back to the 1970s, funding for the program in Gliwice grew out of the OIA's Short-Term Scientist Exchange Program, which generally involves support for researchers from less-developed countries to come and work in U.S. laboratories for six months or less.
Principal Investigator